U.S. Healthcare vs Canada and India

In: Other Topics

Submitted By gdot80
Words 1865
Pages 8
Grade Recieved - "A"

Despite the documented challenges that the U.S. health care system faces, it also enjoys a number of advantages over other systems around the world.

Choose 2 other countries from around the world and discuss the strengths of the U.S. health care system as compared to these countries from an administrator’s and a third-party payer’s perspectives.
In your answer, be sure to not only discuss each strength, but provide an explanation as to why you feel the United States has this advantage over the other countries you chose.

Abstract
United States has many strengths and weaknesses within the healthcare system. In this case, we are going to focus on the strengths of the healthcare system in the United States and how they measure up to the healthcare system in two other countries. Those countries on India and Canada.

The healthcare system within the United States is one of the best in the world. In order to receive a better understanding of the strength of the United States healthcare system, we have to dive into the healthcare systems of other countries. Real life questions were asked, from individuals from two different parts of the world in two different hospitals and how they felt about the healthcare system in the native countries. Once the healthcare systems of India and Canada have been explained, we can dive into the strength of the healthcare system in the United States. The life expectancy of individuals within India is 69 years, which is far lower than the United States average, which is 78 years. Access to medical care and malnutrition continue to be a major problem facing the Indian people. Although it is one of the fastest-growing economies with a thriving middle class, 26% of the population lives below poverty line. About 456 million live on less than $1.25 a day and 46% of children are malnourished.…...

Similar Documents

U.S. Healthcare Concerns

...entities contracted by the state. The idea is to collect enough money to pay for everyone’s health needs, thus simplifying the system and providing care to everybody equally. People in countries that have national care generally don’t pay health care costs in proportion to what they use. By definition, the cost is distributed to those who pay taxes and taxes are disproportionately distributed as well. The single-payer concept of health insurance is perhaps the most convenient way to talk about nationalized health care. Paul Feldstein, a nationally recognized authority on the economics of health care says a single-payer system is when “a government is the only payer of health services.” We see examples of pure single-payer systems in Canada, Cuba, and North Korea (Buerhaus, 2010). Great Britain is an example of a country that was a single-payer system that owned much of the medical establishment; they have since begun allowing other private insurance companies to help control costs. For the purposes of this essay, most European countries can be classified as single-payer systems because the government provides payment for most health services after collecting the funds from taxes. The Economics of Health Care Costs The first item of import to address is the basic consumer use of either of these two systems. On an aggregate basis, consumers have little or no reason to be concerned about the cost of most health care services. This comes about because medical......

Words: 3280 - Pages: 14

Emerging Market Healthcare in India

... A growing healthcare sector Healthcare is one of India’s largest sectors, in terms of revenue and employment, and the sector is expanding rapidly. During the 1990s, Indian healthcare grew at a compound annual rate of 16%. Today the total value of the sector is more than $34 billion. This translates to $34 per capita, or roughly 6% of GDP. By 2012, India’s healthcare sector is projected to grow to nearly $40 billion. The private sector accounts for more than 80% of total healthcare spending in India. Unless there is a decline in the combined federal and state government deficit, which currently stands at roughly 9%, the opportunity for significantly higher public health spending will be limited. Growing population and economy One driver of growth in the healthcare sector is India’s booming population, currently 1.1 billion and increasing at a 2% annual rate. By 2030, India is expected to surpass China as the world’s most populous nation. By 2050, the population is projected to reach 1.6 billion. Figure 1: India is forecast to grow by at least 5% a year for the next 45 years 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Brazil China India Russia 2000- 2005- 2010- 2015- 2020- 2025- 2030- 2035- 2040- 20452005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Source: Goldman Sachs Emerging Market Report: Health in India 2007 PricewaterhouseCoopers 1 This population increase is due in part to a decline in infant mortality, the result of better healthcare facilities......

Words: 6564 - Pages: 27

Cost Reduction of U.S. Healthcare

...Memorandum To: Dr. Robert I. Grossman, CEO NYU Langone Date: November 7, 2012 Re: Restructuring Health Care Payment and Improving Quality The U.S. devotes a much larger share of its national income to health care than any other country in the world. However, the gross over-spending has not yielded the healthiest population (OECD Health data, 2009). Our economy is continually growing at a lesser rate than healthcare spending. The need to restrain this unsustainable growth in health care costs is often overlooked in favor of reform focused on expanding access to care. Attention must be focused on restructuring the payment process with the goal of reducing costs without sacrificing quality. With an aging population comes chronic conditions that require efficiently coordinated care. About 10 million Americans require long term care, 42% of which are under 65 with disabilities or chronic illness (Rowland, 2009). It is also not uncommon for chronic patients to receive duplicate testing, conflicting treatment advice, and expensive prescriptions from multiple practitioners. The Medicare system was a fee-for service payment plan, until a prospective payment was introduced. A contributing factor to the problem has been the trending of hospitals and insurers to better cover acute episodes rather than preventative or ongoing care. For example, the average length of stay is down from less than 8 days in the 1970s to 4.6 days in late 2000’s. In a similar trend, gross......

Words: 1335 - Pages: 6

Canada Healthcare

...every category of patient. For instance, citizens may aspire to have health care serves provided to them with high standards of quality which meets all the way from their basic needs to their most intricate care needs. This paper will explore the advantages and vulnerabilities of the Canadian health care system. Canada Health Act Canadian government, in response to growing economic and social factors, enacted a national health care system to ensure that their citizens had reasonable access to health care regardless of ability to pay for private coverage or other social considerations. On the Parliament of Canada website, they state that “They believe that government insurance can correct the shortcomings in the private market by protecting the broadest possible cross-section of the population and avoiding unreasonable premium hikes which ultimately effect no improvement in the state of health” (CHST, i. t., n.d., p. 3). Further, there is clear evidence that they basic premise is to pool resources to provide the most health care services for all that can be provided. This is demonstrated in their statement, “since its introduction, public health care insurance in Canada has stressed the principle of transferring resources from the richer to the poorer and pooling the risks between the healthy and the less healthy (CHST, i. t., n.d., p. 4). Like the United States, there is a limitation within their Constitution regarding specifics in delivery of health care to the......

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5

Economics in the U.S. Healthcare System

...Economic in the U.S. healthcare system: The $765 billion price tag on wasteful spending Our country aims at continuing to increase the quality of patient care but medical services are being overused at an alarming rate causing great concern. The health spending of this country’s gross domestic product or GDP is 17.6% which is more than any other country (Feldstein). A report from CMS in 2010 states that the total health spending in the U.S. was roughly $2.6 trillion which is twice as much per capita of the average for any other nation yet delivers a lesser amount of care. These figures translate to $8,402 per person. (CMS) The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services predicts that this figure will reach $4.6 trillion by 2020 which translates to almost 20% of our GDP. Table 1. Health care spending as % of GDP in 2010 Source: OECD; The Economist, 2009 Out of the trillions of dollars spent in healthcare, the 2009 PricewaterhoseCooper’s report The price of excess: Identifying waste in healthcare spending estimates that $1.2 trillion is wasted. This is equivalent to more than half of what is allocated towards health spending in the U.S. and the figures are broken down in various categories. The report attributed health wastefulness in the following areas: 1. $765 billion towards issues related to healthcare reform debate (6 major areas...

Words: 3125 - Pages: 13

The U.S. Healthcare System

...The U.S. Healthcare System Non-Profit Versus For-Profit The U. S. healthcare system is generally made up of two classifications. Hospitals may either be classified as non-profit or for-profit institutions. The majority of the hospitals within the United States are considered non-profit. The definition of a non-profit hospital is that its purpose is to serve the healthcare needs of the community. The reason that non-profit hospitals and other organizations were established was with the intention of servicing the needs of all communities. Over time there missions and values changed to have a primary focus on the indigent population. Most are/were well rooted in religion or were created by religious sponsors while others were formed by the humanitarians, nurses, and doctors. One of the distinct differences between non-profit and for-profit hospitals is the rules and regulations, particularly tax status. Non-profit hospitals are not required to pay property, sales, or income tax. It has been suggested that due to the fact the organizations were providing specific social services to the community, they were to be exempt from paying certain taxes. As of April 2012, non-profit hospitals had to begin to abide by four new mandates: * Community Health Needs Assessment * Must have written financial assistance and emergency medical care policy and procedures * Necessary medical care and emergency services must be at the minimum charge/cost. * Be in......

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

India vs Canada

...Canada economic system is also referred to mixed economy because it involves both private and public ownership of resources, and good and services are produced and provided by both the government and privately owned companies. Canada’s system is often referred to a capitalist system because we allow and also encourage the private ownership of capital, that is, the plants, factories, equipment, and so forth that are used to produce and provide goods and services. India has a Mixed Market economy meaning it uses a variety of government regulation to control the economy, but relies primarily on market that forces to set prices and demand and uses general principles of capitalism. India is having a mixed economic structure. It is neither fully capitalist nor fully socialistic. It is neither completely an open system nor a fully free market system. The key variables in the choice of this economic design are: people's welfare, equitable distribution of wealth and income, a logical link between employment and incomes, restraining monopolies and concentration of power and wealth, and supporting health and education sectors through government subsidies and political strength. India has a mixed economy. Half of India's workers rely on agriculture, the signature of a traditional economy. One third of its workers are employed by the services industry, which contributes two-thirds of India's output. The productivity of this segment is made possible by India's increasing......

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Health Care Systems: the U.S. vs. Canada

...The United States health care system is quite unique when compared to Canada’s health care system and those of other countries. Canada provides universal coverage, is privately run and is publicly funded through taxes. The U.S. is the only industrialized country that does not offer universal health coverage. The U.S. is said to be part of the developed world in terms of technology, well trained health professionals and job opportunities although when it comes to health outcomes it doesn’t do so well. Available studies suggest that the health outcomes in Canada were superior to those compared the U.S. The U.S. faces multiple barriers that have made their health care system inconsistent and so costly. In the past the system focused on revenue maximization instead of quality care at an affordable cost. The U.S. spends twice as much more per capita on health expenditures when compared to Canada (O'Neill & O'Neill, 2007). Canada spends much less on health care and yet performs better than the U.S. in health outcomes, infant mortality and life expectancy. A comparison of the U.S. health care system and Canada’s system performance will be evaluated along with the health outcomes that have resulted from each system. The U.S. has a multi-payer private health care system where Canada has a single payer and is mostly a publicly funded system. “In Canada in order to receive full funding for health insurance the provincial government must meet the following criteria: care available to......

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Comparison of Healthcare in Us and Canada

...Project Comparison of Healthcare in US and Canada There are various differences between the healthcare systems in Canada and US. The differences were indelibly noted in 2004 after a policy analyst compared the two countries on the healthcare systems. According to the analysis, it was noted that US has an expensive healthcare system that doubles the Canadian healthcare systems. According to the percapita income expenditure on health report, the U.S spends $6,096 while Canada spends $3,038. On the other hand, other studies that were conducted later after the study was done indicate that the Canadian healthcare systems are better than the U.S healthcare systems. The reviews illustrated that the Canadian healthcare systems give the Canadians better and superior healthcare services as compared to the U.S (Pylypchuk&Sarpong, 2013). Pylypchuk andSarpong (2013) contended that various analysts have found that U.S is one of the countries whose spending on healthcare is big, but suffers the poorest healthcare for its people. Reports show that Canada has longer life expectancy than the US. The report on infant mortality in Canada shows that Canada is better than U.S by a great margin. Although analysts say that the comparative analysis do not give consistent differences between the healthcare systems, U.S is one of the countries that has been spot-lit of the idea of expensive healthcare. The actual reasons for the differences between the Canada and U.S are not yet......

Words: 1854 - Pages: 8

U.S. Compared to Canada

...purpose of this researcher paper to compare health care systems in three highly advanced developed countries: The United States of America, Canada and Germany. The first part of this research paper will focus on the portrayal of health care systems in the above-mentioned countries, while the second part will examine, evaluated and compare the three systems. Finally, a synopsis of recent changes and proposed future reforms in theses countries will be provided as well. The U.S. Health Care System in Perspective According to (The World Bank Group, 2012), the United States is one of the wealthiest nations in the world. The U.S. health care delivery system is complex and massive. It is ran by the government and financed through general taxes. 49.9 million Americans were uninsured in 2010 and 256.2 million were insured (Stark, 2012). The U.S. health care delivery is divided into many sub systems: Managed Care, Military, Vulnerable Populations and Integrated Delivery. Managed Care seeks to achieve efficiency by integrating the basic functions of healthcare delivery. It is the most leading health care delivery system in the United States and is available to most Americans. Employers and government are the primary financiers of managed care. The Military medical care system is available free of charge to active duty military personnel of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Costal Guard. Certain uniformed nonmilitary services such as the Public Health Services and the National......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Compare and Contrast U.S. Healthcare Policy

...Review the health policies of each of the following countries. Then, choose a country from the following list to compare and contrast with the current U.S. healthcare system: China England Germany Australia Canada Japan Once you have thoroughly analyzed the health policy information for your chosen country, answer the following questions: What is the main focus of the policy standard in this (chosen) country? What are the similarities to the U.S. healthcare system? Governance Workforce Leadership Quality How does the U.S. healthcare system differ in terms of policy? Where do you foresee the U.S. healthcare system in the future (long-/short- term)? ( Review from one of the the following perspectives: the provider, the patient, or other stakeholders) Summarize the meaning of universality in U.S. health policy versus your chosen country. (Include your research on the future of the U.S. healthcare system) The paper: Must be 4 to 6 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least four (4) scholarly sources in addition to the course text. Must document all......

Words: 256 - Pages: 2

Us vs Germany Healthcare

...Healthcare in Germany vs. U.S.A Western Governors University Organizational Systems and Quality Leadership Germany’s and the United States’ healthcare systems compare and contrast in many ways. Germany has the third richest economy in the world and many categorize their healthcare system as socialized. Germany provides medical care to all of the citizens—young, poor, old, sick, and injured. Otto von Bismarck the Prussian chancellor in the 1880s in Germany invented the concept of healthcare systems, the notion that a government has to provide mechanisms so all its people can get medical care when they need it. In 1883, the Sickness Insurance Act was passed, representing the first social insurance program. Over the past 130 years the system has grown to the point where virtually all of the population is provided access to medical care. The Germans have what they call “Sickness Funds”, which are paid for by premiums based on income to one of 240 private insurers. A worker earning 60,000 would split a $750 family premium with their employer. It is more expensive than the U.K. but cheaper than the U.S. by about two thirds. It is a system where the rich pay for the poor and the ill are covered by the healthy (Saul, 2014). The United States healthcare system until recently has been mostly controlled by private industries and insurance companies, although we do have Medicare and Medicaid for the old and poor. Recently the Affordable Healthcare Act has been passed which......

Words: 1447 - Pages: 6

U.S Health System vs. Canada Health System

...The U.S and Canada both have their similarities and differences when it comes to the Health System. One similar being is both of their cultures and their health status. They have unlimited access to health care and are able to provide good quality care to their citizens no matter the cost. There are far more differences than similarities though. The most significant differences between the two countries are the role of private health care insurance and spending levels. Canada’s health system seems to do more for less, they provide access of health care to many of its citizens. Canada’s health system allows unlimited access to the public for many medical health services. These different services include the different physician and hospital services for their patients. Their health care system is through a government-sponsored system. They have many advantages and their unlimited coverage is universal and portable. In Canada health system, any and all citizens are covered through medical insurance no matter what their age or job may be. Many health systems won’t give you medical coverage because of your age and that shouldn’t be the case. Just because you may be too young or too old, everyone should have unlimited access or health care coverage. Also just because you may not have a job or have a career job that gives you everything you need for the rest of your life. You should still get coverage and Canada allows this access. One positive being about Canadas health system is...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

The U.S. Healthcare System

...The U.S. Health Care System Catherine Wiley HCS531 September 12, 2011 Kenneth Feldman The U.S. Health Care System A health care system is a “network of agencies, facilities, and providers of health care within a specific geographic region” (Widipedia). The health care system is designed to meet the health care needs of a target population. According to Shi and Singh (2008), “A health care delivery system has two primary objectives: 1. Provide health care to all its’ citizens; 2. Services must be cost effective and meet standards of quality” (5). A system, “consists of a set of interrelated and interdependent components designed to achieve some common goals, and the components are logically coordinated (Shi & Singh, 28). As Shi & Singh (2008) state the health care system in the United States is a mixed market system. The source of coverage comes from the government, insurance from employers, and private payment. The health care system in the United States is not a system because there is no standardization, and is fragmented. Financing, insurance, delivery, and payment is from private and public sources. These four components creates the fragmentation of the system. These components compose the Quad-function Model and are necessary for the delivery of care in the United States. The components overlap to varying degrees in traditional insurance, government-run......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

China vs. India

...lives in the world today knows that technology is becoming a way of life. It seems that no one goes anywhere without their smart phone in their pocket and a GPS in their car. A field that has been completely changed by advances in technology is the medical field. No longer due doctors take ones temperature or blood pressure manually, they have special devices that can give a more accurate reading then a human ever could. Hand held medical scanner technology is showing an astonishing breakthrough and can revolutionize home and hospital medicine just as the home thermometer did. These types of devices have already improved the way care is given in the U.S. greatly and can do the same for countries all over the world. The two countries I chose to enter are ones that have been growing rapidly in almost all aspects, China and India. Handheld medical scanners are a real product being used but are very new and do not have much of a history or a company that solely produces them. So what are they? According to David Freeman in the Huffington Posts article “Star Trek's Tricorder Medical Scanner May Become Reality, Thanks To Nanotechnology Breakthrough,” using nanotechnology, physicists in London and Singapore found a way to make a beam of the "T-rays"--which are now used in full-body airport security scanners--stronger and more directional. The advance, which was described in a recent issue of the journal Nature Photonics, could lead to T-ray scanning devices that are......

Words: 4090 - Pages: 17

Sibelius Preludio Mp3 | Knowing Brother Episode 5 | Wii U (168)