Loop Capital Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By flydon91
Words 523
Pages 3
Finance 469
January 23, 2013

Case 1: Loop Capitol

1. Reynolds Strengths * Educated * Very Social * Confident in his abilities in the business world * According to the reading he seems like he carries himself in a high classed way * Enjoys his job * Daring
Reynolds Weaknesses * Cocky, however in more of a hidden way. He doesn’t just come out and flaunt himself; instead he converse’s with people in a way that makes him seem better than others. * Daring: although I put this in strengths too, I think that being too daring can be bad thing, it is almost as if Reynolds doesn’t know when to stop * Lack of morals in my personal opinion when he used employees to build up his business, rather than training them to make them better and grow with the company

2. Reynolds strategy seemed to work for him in the long run; if I were daring like him and willing to put myself and my business on the line to make it grow then yes I would agree with how he started up his company. However, if I had very little connections and a lot to lose I would not even start up as big as a company as he and his partner did. Even though he was successful in it, I just don’t think I would take that many risks, let alone quit such a great job he had.

3. Based on the case, Reynolds seemed to change his thoughts on how he made a decision for the company. At first he said that capital, people, and distribution would satisfy a growing company. However, later on he said that “Vision and Focus” were key to a growing company. Every decision he had faced came directly from himself and his clients. He stated that listening to what his clients wanted was key to his success. Anything his clients stated, Reynolds went ahead and made it happen.

4. The estimated cost of the infrastructure capital was about $700 million. This project very well could have…...

Similar Documents

Palamon Capital Case

...Investments The Team Board of Advisors Economic Advisor 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 26 40 45 Palamon Capital Partners Introduction Palamon Capital Partners is a private equity partnership. We invest throughout Europe in service-orientated businesses with high growth potential. With €1.1 billion of funds under management, we are backed by some of the biggest investment institutions in the world. We back like-minded entrepreneurs with whom we share a vision to create sector-leading, high-value companies, and who have the necessary experience, flair, initiative, and determination to succeed. We have three major objectives when making an investment: to provide sufficient funds and time to allow the business to reach its full potential; to support and help entrepreneurs build their companies; and to enable our investors to achieve an appropriate return. Palamon Capital Partners was established in 1999 as an independent professional partnership, wholly owned and operated by its partners. Palamon Capital Partners, LP is regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. We back like-minded entrepreneurs with whom we share a vision. Palamon Capital Partners Introduction 1 Philosophy At Palamon we believe in investing in fundamentals. In order to succeed, a company must have a coherent strategy, strong leadership, the ability to develop a significant position in its market and sufficient capital to execute its plans. Our role is to help recognise opportunities for......

Words: 7218 - Pages: 29

Capital One Case Study

...Case questions 1. What is their business strategy to grow profitably and compete over the long term? Capital One Success Factors Pilot Strategy (first stages) • Initially, they began with a pilot strategy at Signet Bank to test their customer targeting systems • Successful and profitable within a couple years – created Capital One Competitive Edge (risk analysis) (redemption offers) (customer loyalty) (targeted offers) • Recognized large customer base in high risk credit customers • Developed IS with data analytics that determined probability of receiving money from high risk customers • Targeted credit options through wide array of data (web streams, credit reports, club cards & memberships) *** • Successful in determining fraudsters and extremely high risk profiles • Allowed a credit building option to people who weren’t allowed credit elsewhere • Successfully expanded customer base through the internet by testing advertisements Customer Retention (customer service) (long term retention) • Real-time data available to customer service agents that showed available credit options to individual customers • Data analysis through SAS Institute and Brio to determine whether or not customers were lying about other offers in order to receive a lower APR • Capital One has lowest default rates among credit companies • Data analysis can eliminate fraudsters and help retain truthful customers Finding Profit with Risk • Advanced data analysis software...

Words: 689 - Pages: 3

Capital One Case Study

...Case questions 1. What is their business strategy to grow profitably and compete over the long term? * Get customer data from whatever sources are available, loading it onto our systems and analyzing it * Put together products that will appeal to different types of people, by testing whether hypotheses are right, looking at the result of these tests, modifying the hypotheses and testing again, and so on * It is all centered around understanding and analyzing information * Capital One can address a much wider group of potential credit card customers, offering credit facilities to individuals who traditional card companies regard as high risk * To do so, it Aggregates as much data as possible on customers - from credit checking information to lists of people's hobbies 2. Describe how Capital One uses information to implement their strategy? What kinds of information do they use and where does it come from (sources)? * The slab of plastic is the key to an information machine—a machine fueled by data on who you are, what sort of people you live among, whether you’ll carry a balance or avoid finance charges at all costs. * This data machine may offer the closest thing ever invented to perpetual motion, because the more you use the card, the more data it produces. * The machine takes your bytes, combines them with transactions by millions of other cardholders—and before long, it can pinpoint what you’re likely to buy next, whether......

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Case Study Cost of Capital

...Case 8 Cost of Capital Nur Aishah Abdul Aziz and Supornthip Nutim @ Salmah Abdullah SYNOPSIS This case is about Maju Group Berhad (Inter-Pacific Industrial Group Berhad) which is also the owner of Maju Coffee Valley Company Sdn Bhd. The company plans to expand its retail outlet from 80 in 2011 to 88 outlets in the year 2013. According to the company’s year plan, Coffee Valley plans to open two outlets in Perak as a new potential area for the business expansion. To achieve this goal, the company needs to raise their cost of capital via long term investment to ensure their company has sufficient capital to set up the new upcoming outlets next year. INTRODUCTION Maju Coffee Valley Company Sdn Bhd recorded 30 percent increase in revenue generally attributed to the company’s aggressive marketing and expansion program as well as introduction of new and innovative products. Therefore the company wants to look into the area that might give them opportunity to expand their business. In order to expand its retail outlet, the top management held meetings to discuss important things that needed to be considered in making a decision. In the meeting, they selected the new rapid development area located in Manjung and Taiping, Perak for the next upcoming outlets to be opened this year. COMPANY BACKGROUND Coffee Valley has a simple and clear mission statement which is to establish Coffee Valley as the best coffees for drinking all the time. The following four Guiding Principles......

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Capital Budgeting Case Study

...Capital Budgeting Case Study Atilano Bonilla QRB/501 October 14, 2013 Vladimir Crk Capital Budgeting Case Study The authors of this paper will analyze and interpret the answers to the Capital Budgeting Case Study presented in Week 6’s material of the Quantitative Reasoning for Business course. The paper presents the rationale behind the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) results, describes the relationship between the two and explains the reasons behind the acquisition recommendation (e) in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Analyzing the Results The case study presents two corporations (A and B) with different revenue values and expenses as well as variable depreciation expenses, tax rates and discount rates. Members of the team computed both corporations’ cash flow, NPV and IRR value using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is equal to the present value of its annual free cash flows less the investment’s initial outlay. Whenever the project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, we will accept the project; whenever the NPV is negative, we will reject the project. (Keown, 2014. p. 310) On the other hand Keown (2014) points out that “the internal rate of return is defined as the discount rate that equates the present value of the project’s free cash flows with the project’s initial cash outlay.” In effect, the NPV method implicitly assumes that cash flows......

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Aspeon Capital Structure Case

...firm’s operating activity, and is directly related to the systematic risk of the firm’s assets. Financial risk is the equity risk that is due entirely to the firm’s chosen capital structure. As financial leverage, or the use of debt increases, so does financial risk and, hence, the overall risk of the equity. Business risk depends on a number of factors, including competition, liability exposure, and operating leverage. b.) In the total risk sense, one common measure of business and financial risk is the variability of ROE, also known as the standard deviation. c.) An unlevered firm's beta depends on the firm's business risk, but the use of financial leverage causes the firm's beta to increase. Thus, within a market risk framework: Total market risk = Business market risk - Financial market risk d.) Business risk is the single most important determinant of a firm's capital structure. The greater the risk inherent in a firm's assets, then, at any debt level, the greater the probability of financial distress for the firm. 2. a.) ( In the table) b.) (In the table) c.) . From the calculations, changing capital structure of the firm increases the risk of the firm so that leveraged firm has a wider range of ROE and a higher standard deviation of ROE .Thus, in the expected(base) case and in the expansion case, leveraged firm has higher returns(ROE) which implies higher profitability. 3.a.) Financial leverage adds risk to the firm’s equity. As compensation, the......

Words: 1460 - Pages: 6

Capital Budgeting Case

...Capital Budgeting Case Shawn P. Oeser QRB/501 October 7, 2013 David Gobeli Capital Budgeting Case For the final week of QRB/501 we were asked to complete a Capital Budgeting Case based on two possible corporations for our company. Based on the 5 year projected income statement, 5 year projected cash flow, Net Present Value (NPV), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR); we were to determine which company would be the wiser acquisition. After completing the analysis it was determined that Corporation B would be the proper choice of the two corporations. According to our text the NPV, “of an investment proposal is equal to the present value of its annual free cash flows less the investment’s initial outlay” (Keown, Martin, & Petty, 2014, p. 310), therefore determining the NPV value of each company is a step needed in determining the whether either company was worth the initial investment. The next step was determining the companies IRR, which is defined in our text as, “the internal rate of return is defined as the discount rate that equates the present value of the project’s free cash flows with the project’s initial cash outlay” (Keown, Martin, & Petty, 2014, p. 310). Yet these were not the only determining factors, we also were required to look at the projected 5-year cash flow and the projected 5-year income statement. When comparing the NPV of both corporations it was clear that the NPV of Corporation B was almost double that of Corporation A at $36,262.58......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Diageo Capital Structure Case

...Case Study 3 “Diageo, Plc.” Introduction บริษัท Diageo ถูกก่อตั้งขึ้นในปี 1997 จากการควบรวมกิจการระหว่างบริษัท Grand Metropolitan plc. กับบริษัท Guinness จนกลายเป็นบริษัทอาหารและเครื่องดื่มที่ใหญ่เป็นอันดับ 7 ของโลก หลังจากการควบรวมกันเป็นบริษัท Diageo ต้องการจะเน้นไปที่เครื่องดื่มแอลกอฮอล์เพียงอย่างเดียว จึงตัดสินใจที่จะขายธุรกิจอาหารไป ได้แก่ Pillsbury โดยขายให้กับ General Mills และต้องการจะออกจากธุรกิจ fast food โดยการออกขายหุ้น IPO ของ Burger King นอกจากนี้ บริษัท Diageo ยังเข้าซื้อกิจการประเภทแอลกอฮอล์ ได้แก่ Seagrams ทำให้บริษัทขยายใหญ่ขึ้นและมีความแข็งแกร่งทางด้านธุรกิจแอลกอฮอล์ ก่อนที่จะมีการควบรวมกิจการนั้น Guinness กับ Grand Metropolitan มี rating อยู่ที่ AA และ A ตามลำดับ แต่พอหลังการควบรวมกิจการเป็นบริษัท Diageo ทำให้มีถูกลด rating เหลือเพียง BBB โดยRating Agencies ได้แก่ Standard and Poor’s และ Moody’s เนื่องจากเกิดความไม่แน่นอนของนโยบายทางการเงินของบริษัท บริษัท Diageo จึงต้องควบคุม Capital Structure ให้มีประสิทธิภาพ โดยการรักษาระดับของ interest cover ratio ไว้ 5-8 เท่า และคงระดับของ EBITDA/Total Debt ให้อยู่ที่ 30% - 35%ถ้าบริษัท Diageo ต้องการรักษา rating ให้อยู่ที่ระดับ A+ นอกจากนี้บริษัทจะต้องใช้นโยบาย Trade-off Theory ซึ่งเป็นการเลือกระหว่างความเสี่ยงและผลตอบแทน กล่าวคือบริษัท Diageo ต้องเลือกระหว่างต้นทุนความล้มเหลวทางเงิน (Financial Distress)และผลประโยชน์ทางภาษี (Tax Shield) โดยสามารถคำนวณจากผลประโยชน์ทางภาษีในแต่ละปีและการประเมินความน่าจะเป็นที่จะเกิดความล้มเหลวทางการเงิน บริษัทมีการใช้ Monte Carlo Analysis......

Words: 828 - Pages: 4

Capital One: Case Study

...Case Study 5.1: Capital One creates value through e-business Capital One Capital One, a leading bank that offers credit card, saving, loan and insurance is based in UK, Canada and the US, was established in 1995. It is an outstanding candidate to study for business experts because it is a highly profitable financial company, which generated a net income of 1 billion dollars in their first ten years. Capital One creates competitive advantage to exceed competitors. Why is Capital One successful? Capital One adapted Information-Based Strategy (IBS) to make important decision by conducting tests. As a company, Capital One believes IBS has made its business successful by reducing the risks and studying business and customers closely to make the best decision and innovation. Capital One thrives to provide customized option for customers at the lowest price possible. In order to satisfy customers, Capital One offers many financial plans and service that suits each individual. Capital One delivers excellent products at a low cost. Capital One was able to succeed because of consistent and excellent customer care. Capital One picks up 90 million calls per days and handles all matters as soon as possible. Capital One provides convenient online services where people can sign up for services during their convenient time. Furthermore, Capital One has made the process of transfer from another bank to Capital One easier and faster through SmartSwitch. Capital one has achieved many......

Words: 983 - Pages: 4

Dell Working Capital Case

...sold the upgraded PCs directly to business by main order. * Subsequently, Dell began to market and sell its own brand personal computer, taking orders over a toll free telephone line, and shipping directly to customers. 2. DELL’S WORKING CAPITAL POLICY AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE * Industry Strategy Assembled to forecast, retaining a substantial finished goods inventory. (Dell ordered components based in sales forecasts). * Dell’s Main Strategy Build-to-order model that causes: * Selling straight to customer and manufacturing cycle that started after a buyer’s order * A personalized purchase within a small amount of time (Dell combined this low cost sales/distribution model with a production cycle that began after the company received a customer’s order. This build-to-order model enabled Dell to deliver a customized order within a few days, something its competitors could not do. Dell also provide toll-free telephone and on-site technical support in an effort to differentiate it self in customer service). * Small finished goods inventory balance, proven by DSI amount. There is no excess stock doesn’t take up room and absorb capital. Low inventory with low fixed assets gives Dell a higher return on capital employed. (Dell had 10%-20% stock while competitors had 50%-70%. TABLE A Days Supply Inventory (DSI)a | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | Dell’s Computer | 55 | 33 | 32 | Apple Computer | 52 | 85 | 54 | Compaq Computer | 72 | 60 | 73 | IBM |......

Words: 958 - Pages: 4

Capital Structure Case

...Store | |Income Statements for the years ended March 31, | | |2009 |2008 | |Revenue |$417,250 |$368,425 | |Cost of sales |258,695 |225,845 | |Gross Margin |158,555 |142,580 | |  | |  | |Expenses | |  | |Depreciation of capital assets |32,000 |34,200 | |Interest |15,200 |17,400 | |Utilities |14,700 |13,900 | |Other |7,500 |6,200 | |Advertising and promotion |6,200 |4,500 | |Salaries and wages |2,000 |2,200 | |Repairs and maintenance |4,150 |2,750 | |Income taxes |12,565 |5,400 | |Total expenses ......

Words: 641 - Pages: 3

Capital Budgeting Case Study

...Team B Capital Budgeting Case Study Karissa Hall, M. Paul Mitchell & Augustine Flores QRB 501 November 9, 2015 Dorrell Crittenden Team B Capital Budgeting Case Study INTRODUCTION A Capital budget is defined as, the process of decision making with respect to investments made in fixed assets—that is, allowing for one to determine what course of action to take especially as concern whether a proposed project should be accepted or rejected or whether an investment should be made (Keown, Martin, & Petty, 2014). Team B’s goal this week was to define, analyze, and interpret a Capital Budgeting Case, that included, (a) a five-year projected income statement, (b) a five-year projected cash flow, (c) Net present value (NPV), and (d) Internal rate of return (IRR). The team has attached a spreadsheet detailing the analysis done for each corporation as well as offering a recommendations of which of the two corporation should be acquired. RATIONALE BEHIND NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV): Net present value ************* ****************** ***************** ******* *************** ************** ************* *********** ************** ******** ********** ************ ************ ************ ************* ********** ****** ********* *************** ************** ************* ******* ******* ********** ************** ****** ********** ************ ************ ****** ******* ******* ************* ********** ************* ************* ********** ******** ******** *******......

Words: 250 - Pages: 1

Mariott Capital Case Study

...Marriott - The Cost of Capital 1/25/2012 Since Marriott and its three divisions all have debt and equity in their capital structure. The cost of capital is the same as Weighed average of cost of capital WACC. WACC = Rd x Wd x (1-T) + Re x We Cost of debt (pretax) = Rd |  |Debt Rate Premium Over |Government Rate* |Pretax Cost of debt | | |Government | | | |Mariott |1.30% |8.95% |10.25% | |Lodging |1.10% |8.95% |10.05% | |Contract Services |1.40% |6.90% |8.30% | |Restaurants |1.80% |6.90% |8.70% | For each division, cost of debt is calculated by US government interest rate plus premium. For Marriott and Lodging, since they have longer useful lives, we use 30 year US government interest rate of 8.95%; for Contract service and restaurants, which have shorter useful life, we use 1 year US government interest rate of 6.9%. Tax rate From Income Statement, tax rates from 1978 to 1987 range from 37% to 47%, average of ......

Words: 1231 - Pages: 5

Dells Working Capital Case

...Harvard Business School 9-201-029 August 16, 2000 D Dell's Working Capital O Dell Computer Corporation had reported impressive growth for fiscal year 1996 with its sales up 52% over the prior year. Industry analysts anticipated the personal computer market to grow 20% annually over the next three years, and Michael Dell expected that his company, with its build-toorder manufacturing system, would continue its double-digit growth. Although Dell Computer had financed its recent growth internally, management needed a plan for financing the future growth. N Company Background O Dell Computer Corporation was founded in 1984 by then nineteen-year-old Michael Dell. The company designed, manufactured, sold and serviced high performance personal computers (PCs) compatible with industry standards. Initially, the company purchased IBM compatible personal computers, upgraded them, then sold the upgraded PCs directly to businesses by mail order. Subsequently, Dell began to market and sell its own brand personal computer, taking orders over a toll free telephone line, and shipping directly to customers. T Selling directly to customers was Dell’s core strategy. Sales were primarily generated through advertising in computer trade magazines and, eventually, in a catalog. Dell combined this low cost sales/distribution model with a production cycle that began after the company received a customer’s order. This build-to-order model enabled Dell to......

Words: 2514 - Pages: 11

Capital Budgeting Case Question

...Chapter 11 The Basics of Capital Budgeting Integrated Case 11-24 Allied Components Company Basics of Capital Budgeting You recently went to work for Allied Components Company, a supplier of auto repair parts used in the after-market with products from Daimler, Chrysler, Ford, and other automakers. Your boss, the chief financial officer (CFO), has just handed you the estimated cash flows for two proposed projects. Project L involves adding a new item to the firm’s ignition system line; it would take some time to build up the market for this product, so the cash inflows would increase over time. Project S involves an add-on to an existing line, and its cash flows would decrease over time. Both projects have 3-year lives, because Allied is planning to introduce entirely new models after 3 years. Here are the projects’ net cash flows (in thousands of dollars): 0 1 2 3 | | | | Project L -100 10 60 80 Project S -100 70 50 20 Depreciation, salvage values, net working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. The CFO also made subjective risk assessments of each project, and he concluded that both projects have risk characteristics that are similar to the firm’s average project. Allied’s WACC is 10%. You must determine whether one or both of the projects should be accepted. A. What is capital budgeting? Are there any similarities between a firm’s capital budgeting decisions and an individual’s investment decisions? ...

Words: 3327 - Pages: 14

PablinFRK | na peru surya 2018 hindi | Sigaretta elettronica Atomizzatori