Daimler and Chrysler: Lessons from a Merger

In: Business and Management

Submitted By piliasilvia
Words 597
Pages 3
CASE STUDY - “Daimler and Chrysler: lessons from a merger”.

This case study is about the merger occurred in 1998 between two big companies in the auto industry: German company Daimler-Benz and American auto manufacturer Chrysler Group. At the end, this merger appeared to be a failure because of different types of problems. Chrysler benefited from Mercedes while benefits to Daimler were harder to find, so that Daimler decided to sell 80% of its stake in Chrysler for just 7.4 billion dollars.

They were two companies from different countries with different languages and different styles that came together although there were no synergies. First of all, these firms operated in the same sector but they had different customers, goals and cultures so there was a lack of common vision and values. Daimler was a luxury brand based on excellence and superior engineering that wanted to enter new markets and develop new products, especially by raising its standing in the North American auto market. On the other hand, Chrysler addressed to “blue collars” purchasers and decided to look for a partner being aware of the overcapacity in the industry. Originally, the plan was for Chrysler to use Daimler parts, components and even vehicle architecture to sharply reduce the cost to produce future vehicles. The operation started with the intention to realize a “merger of equals” but it ended up being more like an acquisition as Daimler strove to impose its own position, even though Chrysler was financially stronger at that moment.

In addition, they had different structures, reporting systems, travel polices, dress codes, level of salaries, decision making processes and working hours. Specifically, Daimler had a tall structure, with high power distance, formal dress code and meetings, annual reporting system, lower salaries of executives and fixed schedule; Chrysler instead had…...

Similar Documents

Daimler Crystler

...Introduction In May, 1998, Daimler-Benz1 and Chrysler Corporation,2 two of the world's leading car manufacturers, agreed to combine their businesses in what they claimed to be a "merger of equals." The DaimlerChrysler (DCX) merger took approximately one year to finalize. The process began when Jurgen Schrempp3and Robert Eaton4 met to discuss the possible merger on January 18, 1998. After receiving approval from a number of groups, (Refer Exhibit I), the merger was completed on November 12, 1998. The merger resulted in a large automobile company, ranked third5 in the world in terms of revenues, market capitalization and earnings, and fifth6 in the number of units (passenger-cars and commercial vehicles combined) sold. DCX generated revenues of $155.3 billion and sold 4 million cars and trucks in 1998. Schrempp and Eaton jointly led the merged entity, as co-chairmen and co-CEOs. | | DCX sources were confident that the new company was well poised to exploit the growth opportunities offered by the global automotive market in terms of geographical and product segment coverage. (Refer Exhibit II for Daimler Benz and Chrysler's product ranges) | However, analysts felt that to make the merger a success, several important issues needed to be addressed. The most significant of these was organizational culture. German and American styles of management differed sharply. A cultural clash would be a major hurdle to the realization of the synergies identified before the merger. To......

Words: 1192 - Pages: 5

Daimler-Chrysler Merger Portrayal

...retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: permissions@elsevier.com.uk. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Customer Support” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rao, Madanmohan. KM tools and techniques : practitioners and experts evaluate KM solutions / Madanmohan Rao. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7506-7818-6 (alk. paper) 1. Knowledge management. 2. Organizational learning. 3. Knowledge management—Data processing. 4. Management information systems. 5. Information resources management. 6. Database management. I. Title Knowledge management tools and techniques. II. Title. HD30.2.R356 2004 658.4¢038—dc22 2004050698 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: 0-7506-7818-6 For information on all Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann publications visit our Web site at www.books.elsevier.com 05 06 07 08 09 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2......

Words: 182966 - Pages: 732

The Daimler Chrysler Merger

...epistemic ones rather than, for example, statistical, physical, or logical probabilities.2 Thus, they can vary from person to person and from time to time, since different persons can be in different epistemic situations at the same time and the same person can be in different epistemic situations at different times. For example, suppose that six hands of poker are dealt. Then the epistemic probability that one hand includes four aces will be different for those players who inspect their hands and find no aces and those players who inspect their hands and discover one or more aces. And the epistemic probability for any of the six players that one hand includes four aces will be different before inspecting his or her hand than after inspecting it. 334 NOUS Now suppose that I succeed in showing that C is true (relative to my own and my readers' epistemic situations). Then the truth of C is (for us) a primafacie good (epistemic) reason to believe that theism is less probable than HI. Thus, since the denial of theism is obviously entailed by HI and so is at least as probable as HI, the truth of C is a primafacie good reason to believe that theism is less probable than not. And since it is epistemically irrational to believe both that theism is true and that it is less probable than not, the truth of C is also a prima facie good reason to reject (i.e., to cease or refrain from believing) theism. In Section II, I will argue that C is true. However, my argument will depend on......

Words: 9076 - Pages: 37

Daimler

...DaimlerChrysler: The Quest to Create “One Company” Case Analysis AMBA 650 Professor Bensimon February 12, 2013 In 1998, the Daimler Benz and Chrysler companies decided to merge together in an effort to capitalize on each other positioning in their respective markets. This merger would join together Germans and American to create synergy to dominate the world automotive market. In theory, this was a brilliant idea to bring together the best engineers and auto stylists in the world. However, differences in culture which was thought to be a minor barrier turned out to be a major underlying factor behind the failure of DaimlerChrysler. Separate cultural ideals on business practices, communications and management destroyed this endeavor. In this case analysis, we will evaluate and understand how cultural differences, organizational structure, management styles, integration strategy and stakeholders played a role in this failure. The cultures of these two companies were totally different; Daimler Benz was aggressive and believed in gaining every advantage possible to be the top automotive company in the world. Chrysler was a firm that was non-aggressive and progressed slowly. They believed that they gained most of their success from production and operations flexibility. In addition to this, the procedures for compensation and decision-making cause severe friction between top level managers of the newly merged DaimlerChrysler. At lower levels, employees......

Words: 1306 - Pages: 6

Lesson from Geese

... Lessons from Geese 'Individual empowerment results from quality honking' Lessons from Geese provides a perfect example of the importance of team work and how it can have a profound and powerful effect on any form of personal or business endeavor. When we use these five principles in our personal and business life it will help us to foster and encourage a level of passion and energy in ourselves, as well as those who are our friends, associates or team members. It is essential to remember that teamwork happens inside and outside of business life when it is continually nurtured and encouraged. Lesson 1 - The Importance of Achieving Goals as each goose flaps its wings it creates an UPLIFT for the birds that follow. By flying in a 'V' formation the whole flock adds 71 percent extra to the flying range. Outcome When we have a sense of community and focus, we create trust and can help each other to achieve our goals. Lesson 2 - The Importance of Team Work When a goose falls out of formation it suddenly feels the drag and resistance of flying alone. It quickly moves back to take advantage of the lifting power of the birds in front. Outcome if we had as much sense as geese we would stay in formation with those headed where we want to go. We are willing to accept their help and give our help to others. Lesson 3 - The Importance of Sharing when a goose tires of flying up front it drops back into formation and another goose flies to the point position. Outcome It pays...

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Fiat Chrysler Merger

...még inkább megköveteli őket. A Fiat és a Chrysler 2009-ban kezdődő együttműködése kiváló példa egy jól működő kooperációra. Nem véletlen az évszám, a válsággal kezdődően, a Chryslernek hihetetlen nagy veszteségei voltak, csakúgy, mint a szintén amerikai vetélytársainak, a Fordnak és a GM-nek. A csődeljárás alatt lévő Chryslernek szüksége volt újabb modellekre és fejlesztésekre, ami persze lehetetlennek bizonyult akkori helyzetében, hiszen sem idő sem pénz nem állt rendelkezésükre. Ekkor jelentették be a Fiat Group és a Chrysler között létrejövő együttműködést, amely biztosította a Chlysler számára az összes műszaki fejlesztést az Olasz cégtől. Robert Nardelli az amerikai cég akkori CEO-ja egy körlevélben úgy fogalmazott, hogy legalább 5000 munkahelyet mentett meg, 10 milliárdnyi fejlesztést és 5 év fejlesztési időt spórolt a szerződés a Chryslernek. Pontosan a Fiat fejlesztéseire volt szüksége a Chryslernek a válság idején, hiszen ő tudott olyan kis- és közepes kategóriás alacsony fogyasztású modellekkel és újításokkal szolgálni, ami abban az időben értékesebb volt, mint az amerikai cég hatalmas benzinzabáló típusai, így nem csupán kilábaltak a válságból, de néhány évre a kritikus mélyponttól már újra hatalmas profitjuk van. Természetesen a Fiat szempontjából legalább ugyanennyire hasznos volt az együttműködés, nem csupán azért mert a Chrysler 35%-os tulajdonosa lett, hanem azért is mert termékeit újra értékesíteni kezdte a Chrysler eladási hálózatán keresztül ......

Words: 1452 - Pages: 6

M&a Analysis of Daimler

...- Lessons in Post-Merger Integration - Jan Daniel Laufhütte 2304958 Individual Written Case Study Report in Strategic Management IHS-3-422 London South Bank University 17/12/2003 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................. i Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1. The changing world automobile industry .............................. 1 2. Reasons for mergers and acquisitions .................................. 3 2.1. 2.2. Daimler-Benzs’ motives..................................................................... 3 Chryslers’ motives ............................................................................. 5 3. The Post-Merger Integration Structure................................... 7 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. Preparations for the merger .............................................................. 7 Integration Structure of DaimlerChrysler......................................... 7 Expected Synergies ........................................................................... 8 4. Cultural Issues ......................................................................... 9 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. Daimler-Benz’s Culture...................................................................... 9 Chrysler’s Culture ............................................................................ 10 Key Integration Problems and Post-Merger Business Culture ....

Words: 3210 - Pages: 13

Daimler

...Daimlerchrysler Merger the Quest to Create “One Company” By cosmonaut21 | October 2012 Zoom In Zoom Out Page 1 of 3 Question 1 In order to understand and be critical on Daimler’s choice of partner, apart from the motives presented in the case, one also needs to consider the enterprise environment trends during the time. 90’s was a wave of mergers and acquisitions characterized by Cross-border ventures (Lipton M., 2006). According to Lipton it was an era where size mattered and mergers were considered the one-way to internationalization and market expansion. Furthermore, nine of the ten largest deals in history all took place in the three-year period 1998-2000. Having established that, one can understand that Daimler was under market and investor pressure to go large. In such an environment, a European company would think of an integrative expansion to the vast US market as the best strategy (Japanese market too cultural different). So, from the choices of either founding a new subsidiary (high risk) or seeking for a JV, or an acquisition or a merger Daimler went for the merger. It was an effort to meet the environmental trend by increasing market share and to make a big impact to the larger competitors. Comparing the three great American car companies, GM was too large (in 1997 GM had $178b revenues compared to Daimler’s $71b) and difficult to control, Ford had investor issues (Ford family), but Chrysler, a similar size company, would seem......

Words: 358 - Pages: 2

Merger Chrysler and Daimler

...Chrysler and Daimler merger case 1) in 1998 the worldwide car market is growing (from 46 million in 1993 to 52 million in 1997), but more and more competitor are present in this business market in a worlwide level. In the 90's the incumbent competitors are threatening by the emergence of Korean manufacturers ( Hyundai, Kia ), because the firm are offering cheap and good quality cars. the emerging firms in the 90's are from Asia, where the work force is cheaper than in westerners country, in this way these firms can offering a high quality product ( Lexus, Infinity, etc) for an affordable price. Thus High end firms as Mercedes, BMW, are threatened by those firms. In this way to face with the competition most of companies are shifting their production toward developing countries for reducing their cost and compete in a better way with these emerging firms. Moreover according to some analysts there would be a reduction from 39 current producers to 20 major companies. That would be because of the high competition that would be especially due to present in the market. Furthermore each year the plant capacity exceeded demand of cars by15 million vehicles, thus the profitability of the firms is reduced, and that affect on the long term financial health of the different firms. Finally the industry is stroke by several mergers and acquisitions, which reinforce the competition in the markets. 2) In my point of view the merger make sense, because in a competitive market firms......

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Life Lessons from Sonic

...think that we learn our most important lessons in school. Others think that the knowledge we acquire outside of school is the most important. Which view do you agree with? Every day we gain knowledge from many sources like lessons in school or experience from outside of school. Manny people prefer to gain through life, but I would rather learn from school lessons. I think getting knowledge from lessons in school is much easier and secure. Starting with advantages of lessons in school, I say it’s much easier to learn because the lessons are taught by trustworthy teachers. For example, my math teacher used to spend half of his period explaining the solution to a difficult exercise for me until I understood. Without him, maybe I never understand the solution. Besides, the knowledge we get from school is always secured. Therefore, there’s no need taking risky mistakes to verify the knowledge again. On the other side, getting knowledge from outside of school is really risky and time-consuming. For example, in order to learn how to run a business, in case of having no former lessons, one needs to try several times, and makes several mistakes before being successful. However, the process itself really takes a lot of time, and if mistakes during the process were too severed, one might not recover to continue. Many people argue that schools only give us theories some of which are impractical, and useless, while all the knowledge gotten from outside of school can be applied......

Words: 289 - Pages: 2

Daimler Chrysler Case Analysis

...Travis McPhail MGMT 4390 Spring 2015 Dr. Jones Case Analysis: DaimlerChrysler In the case “DaimlerChrysler: Post-Merger News”, DaimlerChrysler is facing the strategic issue of figuring out how to bring together the two cultural differences between Daimler-Benz AG and the Chrysler Corporation that would create a positive and profitable synergy for DaimlerChrysler as a whole, while regaining stockholders trust. As the post-merger integration process accelerates, they need to identify opportunities to increase sales, reduce purchasing costs, and create new markets for DaimlerChrysler. DaimlerChrysler internal environment, the company went through many changes post-merger. Starting with the creation of the “Dream Team” in 1998, resignations of key members of the dream team led to a two-tiered board system: the supervisory board and the board of management. There was apparent unrest among top executives and a growing chasm between the Americans and Germans due to differences in management styles, processes, cultures and work styles. DaimlerChrysler implemented a variety of exchange programs designed to help the two companies meld an understanding of the cultural differences between the two and their respective countries. They created the Automotive Council, which allowed the sharing of innovation, knowledge, technologies and ideas between the two companies to drive future product integration. They also created the Executive Automotive Committee (EAC) which worked towards...

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Lessons from the Japanese

...Lessons from the Japanese In the article Management Accounting (and Other) Lessons from the Japanese by Robert A. Howell and Michiharu Sakurai, the differences and similarities between management accounting in the United States and Japan are compared. There are 10 lessons in the article, which summarize the differences between the way companies in the two different countries operate. The article goes over the different viewpoints each country has, but also the similarities between the two. For instance, some companies in Japan have followed the U.S. lead in making management accounting a very integral part of the operations of their company, while some have become efficient enough for it to be an unnecessary function. Also, Japanese companies are very customer focused, as they understand that the customers are the reason they are successful or unsuccessful. American companies tend to focus more on the bottom line and pay attention to the profits to be made instead of the consumers they are providing products and services for. Overall, there are many differences between Japanese and American managerial accounting, but there are also some similarities. It mostly depends on the company the way they practice accounting but the culture surrounding them does have an effect. While there are ten lessons gone over in the article, the lesson we chose to focus on lesson six, Business Planning and Budgeting. Our textbook says that a budget is a formal written statement of the plans......

Words: 731 - Pages: 3

Chrysler Daimler Harvard Business School Case Study

...Chrysler & DaimlerAcquisition-Merger Case Study | | Situation faced by company After facing some hardships and bad acquisitions in the 80s and 90s, Daimler-Benz led by Jurgen Schrempp began to see the light in the mid-90s. By focusing on the most profitable businesses within Daimler and reducing the number of businesses at Daimler from 35 to 23, Shrempp was able to post high profits in 1996 and 1997 despite the poor looking financials in the previous years. In order to remain profitable in this highly competitive market, Shrempp knew that the company had to continue to grow. They needed to reach customers down market without compromising their high-quality brand. To do this, they began selling vehicles to the market’s premium niches and were quite successful. Along with broadening their product offering, they were becoming more and more international with their production because of the high amount of revenues being generated internationally. Schrempp knew that these steps would only keep them competitive for so long though. With the nature and frequency of alliances and mergers in the automotive industry becoming more and more frequent, he knew that to keep up with the changing industry and increased time and cost pressures, he had to take another step in order to not fall behind the competition. SWOT analysis Daimler-Benz | Strengths * Attention to detail * Brand image * Engineering * Global distribution network | Weaknesses * High-cost &......

Words: 5532 - Pages: 23

Daimler Chrysler Case Study

...The merger between Chrysler, the smallest yet most efficient US auto maker with Daimler’s legendary Mercedes-Benz was supposed to be a match made in Heaven. However, Chrysler’s management expectations were quickly erased as CEO Juergen Schrempp of Daimler never intended equality in running the new acquisition. Within the first year, it became apparent that Chrysler had become a division of Daimler - a point Schrempp verified in interviews with the media. Schrempp’s attempts at boosting Chrysler’s sales had flopped; the company experienced huge losses and Schrempp began to send his orders though his German assistant Deiter Zetsche, who was at least able to make some positive progress. However, with no input from Chrysler executives once again, Schrempp made another huge deal by acquiring 34% of Mistubishi Motors, which had been losing money as well. Schrempp also refused to meet with the 3rd largest holder of Daimler/Chrysler stock Kirk Kokorain to explain how he intended to turn the company around, most likely as a result of a clash of cultures, different nationalities, the German focus on hierarchy, or. order and planning. No turnarounds had been made and in 2006, Chrysler posted a 3rd quarter loss of $1.5 billion and it became apparent that Daimler would sell off Chrysler. The merger was over. The underlying intentions of Jurgen Schrempp to never accept the Chrysler merger as an equal should be considered unethical because of his attempts to take advantage of a smaller......

Words: 1404 - Pages: 6

Leadership Lessons from Mandela

...Leading like Madiba: Leadership Lessons from Nelson Mandela Posted on August 17, 2011 by Martin Kalungu-Banda The world is in dire need of great leaders, ones who inspire people not through words but by serving them. The cutting edge in leadership discourse is the old fashioned idea of leadership through service. The whole human race, we could say, desperately needs these servant-leaders who really attend to others and are beacons of hope in our search for a world society where justice, fairness, care for the weaker members of our communities, and love flourish. The call for leaders who genuinely serve their people is obvious in social and political communities. We can see it equally in the economic sphere, in business organisations or corporations. The high turnover of staff in many work places suggests that people are looking for what Lance Secretan, a Canadian guru on leadership, calls ‘soul space’[1] – an environment where they will not simply be cogs in the wheel of production but can live full and happy lives. In my book, Leading Like Madiba: Leadership Lessons from Nelson Mandela[2], published in March 2006, I have attempted to present through stories the type of leadership that will take our world a higher ground.[3] What is so extraordinary about Mr Mandela’s style and practice of leadership is that it crosses the boundaries of culture, gender, race, religion and age. Madiba (as he is fondly referred to in his home country) has done so in a society that was once...

Words: 1623 - Pages: 7

Houkago Orange | Apple Airpods | Camping & Hiking