Current Liabilites and Contingencies

In: Business and Management

Submitted By maxdizon
Words 1349
Pages 6
Current Liabilities and Contingencies

The International Accounting Standards board (IASB) issues the International Financial reporting standards (IFRS) to over one hundred ten countries. The United States is excluded from this group but primarily follows the standards of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). While both accounting standards have some differences, 2016 will be the year the U.S. will make the switch and unite with the IFRS. Current liabilities and contingencies are one of the many areas that standard setters continue to work on financial reporting and the major changes in how to recognize and measure contingent liabilities. The Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board defines current liabilities as, “obligations whose liquidation is reasonably expected to require use of existing resources properly classified as current assets, or the creation of other current liabilities.” In addition, Statement of Financial Statement Standards indicates, “Current liabilities should include obligations that are due on demand or that will become due on demand within one year from the balance sheet date” (SFAS No.78). Operating Cycle is the time between the purchase of an asset and its sale, and the sale of product/good from the asset. Some examples of conventional current liabilities are Accounts payable, Notes Payable, unearned revenues, and employee related liabilities. One of the most popular current liabilities is accounts payable. This account is found on the balance sheet and represents the entity to pay off a short-term debt to its creditors. These are the payments that are owed by the company to other suppliers that offered the individual or company a good or service. There is a period of credit between both parties commonly for 30 - 60 days. For example, many companies offer a term of…...

Similar Documents


...respondents criticized the original dislosure requirements of loss contingencies: “a.The initial disclosure of specific information about a loss contingency often does not occur until a material accrual is recognized for that loss contingency, sometimes taking investors by surprise. b. The at least reasonably possible threshold for disclosing loss contingencies has not resulted in the disclosure of the full population of an entity’s existing loss contingencies that would be of interest to financial statement users. c. The amounts recognized in the financial statements related to loss contingencies are not transparent to users. In order to improve the disclosures about certain loss contingencies, such change of standards is necessary.” In response to this concern, the Board made two roundable discussions and got some feedback from respondents and finally issued an exposure draft stating that “An entity shall disclose qualitative and quantitative information about loss contingencies to enable financial statement users to understand all of the following: a. The nature of the loss contingencies. b.Their potential magnitude. c.Their potential timeing (if known).” It is reasonable the Board revised some proposal in insponse to the comment letters from respondents. For example, respondents argued that some unnecessry disclosure of certain remote loss contingencies would show fianancial statement users and mislead loss contingencies information. “ The Board agreed with this opinion......

Words: 846 - Pages: 4


...John Child, have enlarged on this perspective and identified contingencies, such as environmental conditions, ownership patterns, strategies, and leadership, as important in assessing the appropriate approach to use in a given situation. One attraction of the contingency approach among theorists and practitioners alike is its situational perspective. Those interested in research issues regarding organization and management can use the contingency perspective to explain why some factors influence situations in one setting but have virtually no influence in another setting. Indeed, one objective of research within the contingency framework is to specify those dimensions and conditions that do affect a situation and those that do not. For the manager, the requirement from the contingency perspective is to identify which technique will, in a particular situation, best contribute to the attainment of organizational goals. For instance, under some circumstances, an authoritarian leadership style may be more appropriate than a leadership style that tries to get workers internally motivated. While the contingency approach is useful in recognizing that the complexity involved in understanding human and organizational systems makes it difficult to develop universal principles of management, there have been several criticisms of the approach. For one, it has been pointed out that the logical extension of the contingency approach is that all situations are unique. If this is true,......

Words: 758 - Pages: 4

Current Liabilities and Contingencies

...CHAPTER 13 CURRENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENCIES IFRS questions are available at the end of this chapter. TRUE-FALSE—Conceptual Answer No. Description F 1. Zero-interest-bearing note payable. F 2. Dividends in arrears. T 3. Examples of unearned revenues. T 4. Reporting discount on Notes Payable. F 5. Currently maturing long-term debt. F 6. Excluding short-term debt refinanced. T 7. Accounting for sales tax collected. F 8. Accounting for sick pay. T 9. Social security taxes as liabilities. F 10. Definition of accumulation rights. T 11. Recognizing compensated absences expense. F 12. Accruing estimated loss contingency. T 13. Disclosing gain contingencies. F 14. Sales-type warranty profit. T 15. Fair value of asset retirement obligation. T 16. Reporting a litigation liability. F 17. Expense warranty approach. F 18. Acid-test ratio components. F 19. Affect on current ratio. T 20. Reporting current liabilities. Multiple Choice—Conceptual Answer No. Description d 21. Definition of a liability. d 22. Nature of current liabilities. a 23. Recording of accounts payable. a 24. Classification of notes payable. b 25. Classification of discounts on notes payable. d 26. Identify current liability. c 27. Bonds reported as current liability. d 28. Identify item which is not a current liability. c 29. Dividends reported as current liability. d 30. Classification of stock dividends......

Words: 14522 - Pages: 59


...imagine the amount of trouble a company has to go through to typically deal with this kind of an issue, since a lot is left to interpretation. According to ASC 450-20-25-1, “When a loss contingency exists, the likelihood that the future event or events will confirm the loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability can range from probable to remote.” Thus, M is dealing with a loss contingency because management determined the loss from the claim would be probable at December 2007. Moreover, the loss should be accrued due to ASC 450-20-25-2, since the “amount can be reasonably estimated” and “information is available before the financial statements are issued.” In reference to the actual amount that should be recorded, the case states a range of the estimated loss from $15 to $20 million dollars, $17 million being the most probable. In deciding which amount to record at December 31, 2007, Accounting Standards must again be referenced. ASC 450-20-30-1 states, “If some amount within a range of loss appears at the time to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, that amount shall be accrued.” Given M’s conclusion that the loss was probable and $17 million would be the best estimate in their calculated range, M should record that amount for their loss contingency. Two years later, M was faced with the same question: how to record this matter on their financial statements. In September 2009, a trial took place and the outcome was in......

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Contingency Plan

...Contingency Plans    We have created a contingency plans (CP)  and defined roles and responsibilities (RR) for specific teams for five risks in the areas of Engineering, Manufacturing, Quality Operations, and Supply Chain. The project team has assessed the benefits, costs, and risks of alternative contingency strategies and  have selected several plans that we recommend for each of the core risks. The project team has evaluated the probability and impact of each of the core risks, and prioritized them using a scoring method below. These two dimensions used to evaluate and determine the score and priority of the risk valued as Low=1, Medium=2, and High=3.     The five major risk that will adversely effect the project schedule, cost, and ultimately the success of the project are the event that the LapDock App software module is not completed on time. Second to that would be ensuring high compatibility with the various smartphones and their operating systems. Third is the maintaining the quality of the LapDock hardware manufactured by our oversees partners. The fourth risk event is the possibility that our components supplier goes out of business, or has problems delivering parts due to environmental or political factors. The fifth core risk is the event that LapDock devices and its  packaging are damaged during shipping due to production process and quality of materials. The Risk Identification List shown in Fig 1 below summarizes the risk analysis and......

Words: 1383 - Pages: 6


...classified in different types. The two main categories of these are current liabilities and long-term liabilities. Current Liabilities Current liabilities are often loosely defined as liabilities that must be paid within a single calender year. For firms with operating cycles that last longer than one year, current liabilities are defined as those liabilities which must be paid during that longer operating cycle. A better definition, however, is that current liabilities are liabilities that will be settled either by current assets or by the creation of other current liabilities. Example of current liabilities include accounts payable, short-term notes payable, commercial paper, trade notes payable, and other liabilities incurred in the normal operations of the business. Some of these normal operating costs include salaries payable, wages payable, interest payable, income tax payable, and the current balance of a long-term debt that will be due within a single year. Other long-term obligations, such as bonds, can be classified as current because they are callable by the creditor. When a debt becomes callable in the upcoming year (or operating cycle, if longer), the debt is required to be classified as current, even if it is not expected to be called. If a particular creditor has the right to demand payment because of an existing violation of a provision or debt statement, then that debt should be classified as current also. In situations where a debt is not yet callable,......

Words: 1603 - Pages: 7

Current Liabilities and Contingencies

...ACCT 2015 INTERMEDIATE FNANCIAL ACCOUNTING 11 Current Liabilities, Contingencies & Provisions Required Reading: Alfredson – Chap 5, Keiso – Chaps 13, IAS 37 Learning Objectives 1. CURRENT LIABILITIES: – Define and explain types of current liabilities. – Account for the major types 2. IAS 37 PROVISIONS & CONTINGENCIES – Define Provisions and answer the following questions: • • • Why do them When to provide How much to provide – Calculate and account for Restructuring Provisions – Define Contingent Assets & Liabilities and apply relevant measurement and recognition rules – Apply IAS 37 Disclosure Requirements CURRENT LIABILITIES LIABILITY – Claims against the business arising out of a past transaction that will cause an outflow of resources e.g. loans, notes payable • Long-Term Liability - Obligations that a company does not reasonably expect to liquidate within the normal operating cycle Current Liability - Obligations that a company reasonably expects to liquidate either through the use of current assets or the creation of other current liabilities. • 1 CURRENT LIABILITIES E13-2 (Accounts and Notes Payable) The following are selected 2007 transactions of Sean Astin Corporation. Sept. 1 - Purchased inventory from Encino Company on account for $50,000. Astin records purchases gross and uses a periodic inventory system. Oct. 1 - Issued a $50,000, 12-month, 8% note to Encino in payment of account. Oct. 1 - Borrowed $50,000 from the Shore Bank by......

Words: 2090 - Pages: 9


...faculties. Take one example in appointment process; while the tenure-track faculty are offered plentiful services for their scholarly work, have compensated time for shared-governance, have assessment for potential work, and are supported in professional advancement; the non-tenure-track faculty, in contrast, are rarely reviewed and evaluated by academic colleagues, receive little care from instituitions, have less academic freedom. All of those constraints discourage contingent faculty to conduct scholarly work, exploration and experiment of new knowledge for pedagogies. Hiring too many contingent faculty does not resolve the issue of higher education in the long run, as Maria Maisto and Steve Street write in the article “ Confronting contingencies: Faculty equity and the goals of academic democracy” “Treating the symptoms does not necessarily lead to the correct diagnosis or treatment of the underlying disease, and in fact it can further mask the real root of disorder.” To maintain a healthy education, it is highly demanding that instituitions employ more tenure-track faculty, and offer tenure-eligible appointments for individuals holding contingent appointments....

Words: 560 - Pages: 3


...FIEDLER CONTINGENCY MODEL: The Fiedler Contingency Model was created in the mid-1960s by Fred Fiedler, a scientist who studied the personality and characteristics of leaders. The model states that there is no one best style of leadership. Instead, a leader's effectiveness is based on the situation. This is the result of two factors – "leadership style" and "situational favourableness". Leadership Style: Identifying leadership style is the first step in using the model. Fiedler believed that leadership style is fixed, and it can be measured using a scale he developed called Least-Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale. The scale asks you to think about the person who you've least enjoyed working with. This can be a person who you've worked with in your job, or in education or training. You then rate how you feel about this person for each factor, and add up your scores. If your total score is high, you're likely to be a relationship-orientated leader. If your total score is low, you're more likely to be task-orientated leader. The model says that task-oriented leaders usually view their LPCs more negatively, resulting in a lower score. Fiedler called these low LPC-leaders. He said that low LPCs are very effective at completing tasks. They're quick to organize a group to get tasks and projects done. Relationship-building is a low priority. However; relationship-oriented leaders usually view their LPCs more positively, giving them a higher score. These are high-LPC leaders. High......

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Contingency Plan

...Contingency Theory of Leadership Bus 210 February 13, 2015 Charles May   Contingency Theory of Leadership Contingency Theory of Leadership Description of work envi-ronment The work environment I will describe is my last em-ployer. I was on the Project Management team for construction. Our goal was to build project timelines for builders and developers in a timely manner by following a timeline we provide depending on a number of variables. Our goal is to have the project complete by the time it was promised as well as provide great service. In the table below, categorize different leadership approaches that could be used in the work environment you have described. Provide different suggestions for each of the four approaches to leadership. Directive approach Supportive approach This approach is when a manager or leader gives his/her employees tasks and tells them exactly how to perform a task. I can see this approach being use-ful with departments such as Customer Service. This approach is usually seen in training classes. I feel this was an important part of me learning more about the company, how it operated, and how to navigate within the different systems. I have experienced this approach when I was first hired on to the company and was told what my responsibilities were as a Project Manager and how to navi-gate within our system. With the supportive approach, it is when a manager would give his/her subordi-nates the tools......

Words: 718 - Pages: 3

Current Liabilities and Contingencies

...Current Liabilities and Contingencies Current Liabilities IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, requires liabilities to be classified as current or noncurrent. Current liabilities are those liabilities that a company: a. expects to settle in its normal operating cycle, b. holds primarily for the purpose of trading, c. expects to settle within twelve months of the balance sheet date, or d. does not have the right to defer until twelve months after the balance sheet date. The classification and accounting for current liabilities under IFRS is very similar to U.S. GAAP. Differences relate to the following: * Refinanced short-term debt – may be reclassified as long-term debt only if refinancing is completed prior to the balance sheet date (under U.S. GAAP, a refinancing agreement must be reached but the refinancing need not be completed by the balance sheet date) * Amounts payable on demand due to violation of debt covenants – must be classified as current unless a 12-month waiver is obtained from the lender by the balance sheet date (waiver must be obtained by the annual report issuance date under U.S. GAAP) * Bank overdrafts – are netted against cash if the overdrafts form an integral part of the entity’s cash management (classified as current liabilities under U.S. GAAP). * Deferred income taxes – deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are not allowed to be classified as current (under U.S. GAAP,......

Words: 3094 - Pages: 13


...Contingencies 1. For the year-end December 31, 2007, financial statements, what amount should M record as a liability? For year-end December 31, 2007 M Company should accrue the liability in the amount of 17 million and disclose the liability in the notes of financial statements. M company should accrue the liability for the contingency and disclose the nature of the liability within the notes to the financial statements. This is in accordance with guidance under ASC 450-25-2, which stated, in part: An estimated loss from a loss contingency shall be accrued by a charge to income if both of the following conditions are met: a. Information available before the financial statements are issues or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements. Date of the financial statements means the end of the most recent accounting period for which financial statements are being presented. It is implicit in this condition that it must be probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. b. The amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. 2. For the year-end December 31, 2019, financial statements, should M adjust its liability? If so, what amount should be recorded; and should the amount of the adjustment be considered a 2009 event or a prior period adjustment. For year-end December 31, 2009 M......

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Contingency Plans

...Contingency Plans G.S. is an experienced nurse on the medical/surgical floor at a community hospital. G.S. is the charge nurse for the floor and needs to make decisions regarding staffing in the morning. A blizzard with 2-3 feet of snow and damaging winds is forecasted within the next 12-18 hours. It is the charge nurses responsibility to make the decision on proper emergency protocol for safe patient handling. There should be a contingency plan in place in all hospitals to adhere to during a crisis situation. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) is used in Florida for all hospitals for emergency and non-emergency situations. The CEMP is responsible for the government, private, volunteer and non-governmental organizations consisting of the State Emergency Response Team (SERT). It helps with a basic process for awareness, recovery, response, and mitigates activities of the SERT. The CEMP ensures that all levels of government are able to mobilize as a unified emergency organization to safeguard the well-being of the state’s residents and visitors (Florida Disaster, 2016). CEMP provides a framework which doesn’t depend on any particular individual or situation but adjustable to the situation. A disaster contingency plan is prepared in every organization to respond to an emergency and the impact it can have to the people. Having a contingency plan in place can save time and confusion during a crisis. A contingency plan takes the guessing out of the situation and...

Words: 968 - Pages: 4


...Case Study: Contingency: BP a. A contingent liability is a potential liability that depends on a future event occurring or not occurring; or past events that are not recognized because the outcome is not probable or the amount of obligation cannot be measured. Examples: Law suits and government agencies investigations and product warranties. A contingent liability and the related contingent loss are recorded with a journal entry only if the contingency is both probable and the amount can be estimated. If a contingent liability is only possible (not probable), or if the amount cannot be estimated, a journal entry is not required. When a contingent liability is remote (such as a nuisance suit), neither a journal nor a disclosure is required. b. A warranty is a contract between a company and its customers. From BP stand point, the warranty gives BP an additional protection from buying the telescopic joint. From GE oi & Gas, the warranty gives GE the responsibility to repair or replace the product if it is damaged or faulty. c. G Firms must make several judgments to account for contingencies. For example, with respect to the warranty on the telescopic joint, GE Oil and Gas must estimate how many joints will require servicing (failure rate), of those, how many will actually be serviced (i.e., how many customers will remember that the product is under warranty and make a claim to GE Oil and Gas to get it fixed), and the projected cost per repair. For GE...

Words: 2343 - Pages: 10

Contingency Theories

...without going back to their origins (Field & Seters, 1990) There are several leadership theories that have been researched, developed and discussed by various researchers. They include; personality, influence, behavior, situational, transactional, anti-leadership, culture, transformational and contingency theories. The sole objective of this essay is to critically evaluate a group of contingency theories of leadership. The most notable contingency theories of leadership include Fried Fiedler’s, Path-Goal and Vroom-Jago (Field&Seters, 1990). This essay will start by evaluating Fiedler’s theory, followed by Path-Goal theory and the last three theories will be evaluated as a single group and it will discuss which of the said model is best suited to improve the work culture in Zambia. According to (Bryman, 2011), contingency theories are advanced on the platform that dictates that there is no single best method that can be used alone to make a decision or lead an organization. These theories seek to offer and explain the effectiveness of a given leadership style. Thus, the theories differ in the way they address and deal with a specific situation. Fred Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership is basically about how certain leaders fit in certain situations as a result of their leadership styles. In addition, the theory depends on how the leader responds to a given situation. The situational favorability in this theory is predetermined by the leader’s style of......

Words: 3303 - Pages: 14

dean koontz | Catweazle | Glory Sound Prep