Civil V. Criminal

In: Other Topics

Submitted By mleclair06
Words 701
Pages 3
Civil actions and criminal actions are both handled in a court of law, but they don’t carry the same kinds of penalties. Civil actions are the kind of court cases that usually involve the damage to a plaintiff’s property, or physical injuries that are a result of misconduct by the defendant. Civil actions usually don’t require either party to have lawyers present, and can be handled in a single visit to court rather than repeat visits and appeals. Criminal actions on the other hand are much more complicated, and will involve lawyers who are either court appointed or obtained by the defendant themselves. Criminal action is brought on by the state, and will involve a defendant who has committed a crime that ranges from a simple assault, robbery, OUI, attempted murder, or the death of another.
The goal of all civil cases it to reach an agreement, or try and make right of a situation that has lead both parties to court. A Civil case allows both the plaintiff and defendant to state their case, it’s also is a chance for the plaintiff to be compensated for any money or property they are owed.
The goal of all criminal cases is for the state to hand down forms of punishment to those who have broken the law. Criminal cases also give the public a sense of security, knowing that the people who have committed a violent or reckless crime will be held accountable, and punished based on the nature of the crime.
Civil cases don’t involve any kind of incarceration, but do involve the defendant having to pay back what has been taken or owed based on the nature of the case. Criminal cases almost always result in the suspect spending some time locked up, unless the parties involved can agree on a plea deal that will result in no incarceration.

The crime that I chose to fit both civil and criminal statues is medical malpractice. According to www.legaldictionary.com defines…...

Similar Documents

Criminal Law and Civil Law

...describing what criminal law means that the society is protected thru this laws and the violation of this laws by any person will result in imprisonment or fines. The fines or time of imprisonment for the violator of the law will depend on the grade of the law broken. Criminal laws are made to protect everybody in the society, and to prevent crimes from happening. To give an example of a criminal law that has been broken could be a murder. If somebody kills another person to rob him or just make danger then this person will be prosecuted for violating a criminal law. Civil laws are a bit different from criminal laws because they are created to compensate the persons or entity when they have been affected by the broken law of another person. For example if someone crashed their car into a house then this person should pay the homeowner for the damages and to repair it. Also in the civil laws business are cover and if somebody do something to affect a company then they are breaking a civil law. These laws is mainly created to protect not only the people’s properties but to protect business. Both of these laws are somewhat easy to understand because they clearly state what they mean and what are they for. Both of these topics can be applied in my line of work in any type of situation, for example if working in the dealership a crash a car into a property then the civil law will be applied on me and if a kill someone with this crash I can be prosecuted for breaking a criminal......

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Civil Liberties

...Americans today enjoy many civil liberties regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation or ethnic background. The road to earning these civil liberties has been tainted with much pain, tears and suffering. It has not been easy for the different groups represented within the population of Americans to obtain and protect their rights. This essay will recount the bloody paths Americans of all colors had to follow in order to enjoy the civil liberties which so many take for granted today. The origins of civil liberties for the United States dates back to England. The United States has a clean start by including the Bill of Rights in the American Constitution. The Bill of rights at first were the symbolism of American ideals because there was no way of enforcing them until 1803 where in the case of Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court took action in striking down laws for the first time that were considered unconstitutional. From that point on the Supreme Court established a precedent of wielding the power to strike down any unconstitutional legislation. Marbury v. Madison happened long before the Civil War and before any of the other cases mentioned. However its importance to civil liberties is essential to any civil liberty essays because it was the one case that allowed for the Supreme Court to take action and enforce the bill of rights along with any other law that is deemed unconstitutional. It was this case that brought about the exercise of judicial review in the United......

Words: 2983 - Pages: 12

Criminal vs Civil

...Criminal Law vs. Civil Law There are numerous differences between criminal and civil law. Criminal law is defined as a body of rules and statutes that defines conduct prohibited by the government because it threatens and harms public safety and welfare and that establishes punishment to be imposed for the commission of such acts. (The Free Dictionary by Farlex) Civil law is defined as the body of laws of a state or nation dealing with the rights of private citizens. (The Free Dictionary by Farlex) In an attempt to explain the difference, you must first understand criminal law. Criminal laws are substantive and divided into categories of misdemeanors and felonies. The primary difference between misdemeanor and felony is the distinct punishments and issues regarding severity. In general, a misdemeanor is a violation of a meager crime. Misdemeanors typically do not involve violent actions or crimes that cause great harm to a society. Common forms of misdemeanors include: resisting arrest, simple battery, shoplifting, public intoxication, and in some states possession and use of marijuana. In contrast, a felony is a serious crime, such as rape, murder, kidnapping, grand theft auto, or assault with a deadly weapon. Convicted felons will undoubtedly face jail time. The Federal Government states that a felony is any act that carries a minimum one-year prison sentence (Difference Between a Misdemeanor and Felony). In criminal law and with criminal court the prosecution is......

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Civil V. Criminal

...Quite simply, criminal law deals with violations of statutory crime and its punishment, civil law deals with non-criminal things such as contracts/business, and things such as divorce, etc. You can be charged under both criminal and civil proceedings though. A perfect example is OJ Simpson being aquitted of criminal charges but being found guilty in civil proceedings. Probably the biggest difference between the two is what is called "BURDEN OF PROOF" In criminal proceedings the burden is "BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT" for someone to be convicted. This means that the evidence points substantially towards guilt and there is little to no question of guilt. For a jury in this case you would need everyone in agreement or the case is a mistrial. Unaminity is the key. In civil proceedings all that is required is "preponderance of evidence" which means that if it is found that it was more likely than not that an incident occured then you can be convicted. This kind of proceeding is really a "who has the best evidence" type of case. Only a majority of jury members decision is needed in this case. 1. Criminal Law cases must prove the person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, whilst civil cases must be proved on the balance of probability 2. The main difference however is who the law is aimed at. Theoretically criminal law is a considered to be harming all members of society. Consequently, the victim of the criminal case is all of society; hence the case is brought on...

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Civil Rights V. Public Order

...Civil rights are personal liberties that belong to an individual, owing to his or her status as a citizen or resident of a particular country or community. The most common legal application of the term civil rights involves the rights guaranteed to U.S. citizens and residents by legislation and by the Constitution. Civil rights protected by the Constitution include freedom of speech and freedom from certain types of discrimination. The term privileges immunities and is related to civil rights. Privileges and immunities encompass all rights of individuals that relate to people, places, and real and personal property. Privileges include all of the legal benefits of living in the United States, such as the freedom to sell land, draft a will, or obtain a divorce. Immunities are the protections afforded by law that prevent the government or other people from hindering another's enjoyment of his or her life, such as the right to be free from illegal searches and seizures and the freedom to practice religion without government persecution. Public order means to function or act in a manner that is non offensive to the public. You can't incite someone to violence and you can't just shoot of your windows. Maintain public order is very important because crime is hard enough to stop as it is. With out having any type of public order there would be people committing crimes and bad things happening every second of everyday, so law enforcement would not be able to keep up with all the......

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure

...Running head: Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure | | | Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Civil Procedure In defining the term law, tort law, criminal law, contract and the sources from which law derives, I will use a case that took place in 1929 “Donoghue v Stevenson” to demonstrate the these laws which will show a successful negligence suit, as well as defenses a defendant presenting evidence to refute a plaintiffs evidence. J.G. Holland said it best! In the words of J. G. Holland “Laws are the very bulwarks of liberty; they define every man’s rights, and defend the individual liberties of all men”. Laws are derived from the United States Constitution; Constitutional law is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. Established Constitutional and administrative law govern the affairs of the state. Constitutional law concerns both the relationships between the executive, legislature and judiciary and the human rights or civil liberties of individuals against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a single codified constitution with a bill of rights. A few, like the United Kingdom, have no such document. A "constitution" is simply those laws which constitute the body politic, from statute, case law and convention. Law is defined as a system of......

Words: 1720 - Pages: 7

Civil and Criminal Cases

...Running head: CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES Civil and Criminal Cases Lawanda Hall Kaplan University PA 101: The Paralegal Professional David Bondanza There are many distinctions between civil and criminal cases. There are also many differences in the way these cases are handled. In order for us to understand them, we must first know and understand what they are. Civil law deals with the disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two, in which compensation is awarded to the victim. In a civil case the plaintiff can be an individual, corporation or government agency. Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crime and the legal punishment of criminal offenses. A criminal case is intended to accomplish this by providing an incentive for persons to act reasonably in society and imposing penalties on persons who violate those (Goldman & Cheeseman). At the beginning of a federal criminal case, the main characters are the U.S. attorney (the prosecutor) and the grand jury. The U.S. attorney represents the United States in most court proceedings, including all criminal prosecutions. The grand jury reviews evidence presented by the U.S. attorney and decides whether there is sufficient evidence to require a defendant to stand trial. According to William Geldart, "The difference between civil law and criminal law turns on the difference between two different objects which law seeks to......

Words: 917 - Pages: 4

Scenario Involving Civil Liability and Civil Action

...Scenario Involving Civil Liability and Civil Action Jacquelyne Anderson Professor Phillip Edwards CJ499-01 September 14, 2014 In this scenario project I will identify four alleged crimes and one criminal civil action. In addition, I will apply principles involving criminal law relevant to the criminal justice practice, and I will demonstrate my understanding of civil liabilities relative to criminal justice agencies, and practitioners. Furthermore, I will identify case laws relevant to the possible civil action that could be brought against the police officer, the department and the city. After addressing these issues, I will have described a scenario involving a civil liability and a civil action. When identifying the four alleged crimes and the one criminal civil action, regarding this scenario project, the four alleged crimes are: 1) attempted robbery, 2) drug possession, 3) carrying a gun, and 4) assault and battery. After speaking to a female victim, Officer Jones noticed an individual who partially fit the description, and walked toward them. Officer Jones identified himself, and told the individual to stop. Unfortunately, this individual did not stop, and kept on walking from the officer, and the officer shouted again identifying himself, but this time the individual stopped. When the individual stopped he looked at the officer and there was a big bulge in his right pocket, but refused to put his hands where the cop could see them. The subject began...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Civil Liability

...Private Police and Civil Liability Dan Seemann SEC/350 August 4, 2014 Darrin Waters Civil Liability and Private Police Private police and security continue to grow at a rapid pace because of reduced Constitutional restrictions, but employers must also understand the increased civil liabilities associated with employing private security. This paper will help to evaluate civil liability and how these liabilities are applied to private police forces. Another key element will be to identify and recommend certain measures that can be implemented to help mitigate organizational and institutional liability. Mitigating these liabilities will enable a larger return on investment for the business using these private security forces. Potential for Civil Liability Civil liability is considered the potential responsibility for payment to be assessed to an individual or organization that has incurred damages based on a lawsuit. There are several different factors that can determine the potential for liability based on certain tort laws that may be applied. A tort is considered to be a wrongful act that was committed that may result in compensation based on varying levels of proof and damages that are present. Rules, evidence, precedent, and judicial discretion all help to determine which category or tort law will be applicable. The elements and burden of evidence and proof can also vary from state to state, and can focus on......

Words: 3272 - Pages: 14

Should a Business Have Civil Liability for the Criminal Acts of Its Employees?

...Should A Business Have Civil Liability for the Criminal Acts of Its Employees? A business should have civil liability for the criminal acts of its employees when the criminal acts are done in connection with the employee performing work for the company. This includes acts that were both known and unknown by the employer. Vicarious liability and respondeat superior are two large factors in businesses being liable for their employees, and it is vital to understand what does and doesn’t fall under these doctrines. Businesses have a duty of care to hire, train, supervise, and retain employees that are responsible and ethical members of society; if an employee commits a criminal act while representing the business, then the employer has breached its duty of care. Employees represent the business they work for, and a business reaps benefits of its employees as far as sales and goodwill are considered, therefore the business should be held responsible for its employee’s acts because the employee is acting on behalf of the business (“Defining an employer’s duty of care,” n.d.). There are a few key reasons that a business should have civil liability for the criminal acts of its employees. Imposing liability on a business may give it an incentive to invest in higher standards for hiring, supervision, and retention of its employees to prevent these crimes from occurring. From a firm’s standpoint, it is much more favorable investing in the hiring and training of employees......

Words: 1308 - Pages: 6

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

...gained their freedom during the Civil War; however, this did not mean they were fully integrated into American society. After the war, Southern Whites faced a crisis. The emancipation of slaves and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship undermined their assertion that citizenship was for Whites only. The clear line between Whites who ruled and Blacks who were ruled became vulnerable. Since Whites slave owners could no longer treat the former slaves as non-citizens, they sought to strengthen this distinction by restoring slavery as best they could. Imposing disabilities on Black civil rights that limited their access to full citizenship was a goal to reach. Within months of the Civil War’s end, former Confederate states passed Black Codes to regulate the behavior of the former slaves as well as their status. Congressional Reconstruction was still a year away, and white Democrats who governed state legislatures passed laws that restricted the liberty of the former slaves. Although Black Codes granted African American certain rights such as legalized marriage, ownership of property; the laws prohibited interracial marriage for the fear of weakening the White race, denied them the rights to testify against Whites in court, jury service and the right to vote. The Black Codes also forced African Americans to labor and constrained their freedom of movement. Individuals not under control of white land owners through labor contracts became criminals, and were put under......

Words: 1356 - Pages: 6

Criminal and Civil Law

...Between the Criminal and Civil Justice Systems? There are two different types of court systems: criminal and civil. There are vast differences between the two systems, including different types of punishments, laws, and burdens of proof. While the two systems are usually separate, there are some situations where they seem to overlap, such as wrongful death cases and cases involving police misconduct. How Does Each System Work? The first difference that should be noted is that in the criminal system, the government (either state or federal) seeks to punish a person for violating rules that have been set by a state legislature or Congress. In the civil system, there is usually a dispute between individuals or organizations as to rights and/or duties that they owe each other. In the civil system, the injured party starts things by bringing a suit. On the other hand, a prosecutor can bring a criminal case regardless of the victim¿s wishes. What Punishment are Available in Each System? In the criminal system, if you are convicted you could face fines, probation, and jail time. If you are found to be liable in a civil case, you face possible monetary damages and you may be forced to give up property. But, you will never face jail time in a civil case. Also, it should be noted that one of the purposes of the criminal system is to stigmatize an individual, unlike the civil system. What about the Burden of Proof? The burden of proof is higher in criminal cases. For a criminal......

Words: 438 - Pages: 2

Civil Procedure V. Criminal Procedure

...Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure ENC 1102 34 Week 11 Individual Work Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure Civil procedure relates to the process where two parties bring a case to the court for a decision on a particular problem. These problems can include but are not limited to divorces, estate distribution, work men’s comp., injury cases, or even matters such as discrimination in the workplace. Criminal procedure applies to the process where the state or federal government is charging and trying someone for a crime that was committed (Civil Procedure, 2012). The rules in civil procedure are different than those in criminal procedure because the actions that need to be taken are different. Firstly, civil procedure requires that a civil case must begin by filing a complaint. The complaint is then, served to the offending party. Once the defending party receives the complaint, they then drafts and files an answer with the court. A party in a civil case can be anyone including people, businesses, and government personnel. When the parties go in front of the court in a civil case, it is to determine whether a person was injured and if they were injured, how much should be compensated for that injury. All of this information pertaining to the civil case is specifically drafted into the court documents (American Bar, 2012). Civil cases, also, have some Constitutional protection in place. For example, the parties involved in a case must file and receive consent of......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Civil and Criminal Penalties for Embezzlement

...Embezzlement is a serious crime that carries penalties in both the civil and criminal court systems. When you embezzle money or property from a company, you should know that you are taking serious risks. Essentially, embezzlement occurs when a person or persons in a company receive money or property because they've been given a certain degree of trust. As you can tell, the law is quite vague on this particular crime. As with many criminal offenses, the civil penalties are just as stiff as the criminal ones, though you cannot be given jail time at the ruling of a civil court judge. In most cases, offenders face criminal charges first, then move on to civil court afterward so that the company can reclaim what it lost. In other words, you'll likely be in jail with no money for the commissary. When you commit the crime of embezzlement, the strongest evidence against you will likely be a paper trail that leads directly from you to the missing money or assets. This often occurs because the person charged is the only individual with access to the funds, and thus becomes the prime suspect by the process of elimination. If no one else could have done it, in other words, you're the guilty party. In the criminal court system, the penalties for embezzlement usually include a jail sentence and a fine, both of which can be substantial. The United States Code, Title 18, deals with all forms of embezzlement, of which there are many. The sentence you receive will depend on the nature......

Words: 470 - Pages: 2

Civil and Criminal Procedures

...Civil and Criminal Procedures–LEG 110 Define a Family. A family is a group of people who share are joined by blood, marriage, or adoption. It is also a group of people residing together consisting of parents, children, and other relatives by blood or marriage. Finally, a family is a group of people residing together who have consented to an arrangement similarly to those of blood or marriage. Explain What Constitutes a Marriage. Marriage is a legitimate contract between a man and a woman who mutually promise to live together in a relationship in law for life, or until the legal termination of their relationship. Once both parties have entered into a marriage contract, the legal status of both parties will have changed giving the husband and wife new rights obligations and benefits. Public policy is intensely in favor of the institution of marriage. Conventionally, marriage has been viewed as vital to the preservation of morals and is believed to sustain the family unit in our civilization. In the United States, marriage is regulated by individual states. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that states are permitted to reasonably regulate marriage by stipulating who can marry and the method in which they can dissolve a marriage. All states limit people to one living husband or wife at a time, and will not issue a marriage licenses to anyone who has not divorced a living spouse. Once someone is married, the only way they can be legally liberated from his or her spouse...

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Film streaming gratuit | Rethinking Special Education Due Process | Comments 0